In 2008, the campaign for the Democratic party nomination for president has been charged with energy, public interest, scandal and sensationalism. As a moderate conservative I never really cared much for the discussions for the Democratic Party and never paid much heed. With the writer's strike and apparently a surplus of time on my hands, I've found myself drawn to the discussion.
The thing is what I've found in this debate between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama is that I've been misled. I thought that the Democratic Party was supposed to be more socially conscious, liberal, and racially sensitive. However, I've found the discussions on this topic to be anything but true.
Hillary Clinton is quietly playing the race card, never condemning Obama for being black, but taking advantage of every situation where her whiteness benefits her. Insidious in the way she condemns states for opposing Obama because of his ethnicity, such as the states of Ohio and Indiana, all the while campaigning heavily there because she needs those white-prejudiced votes.
Also the issue of Obama and his reverse-racist pastor blaming white Americans for 911 etc. Obama's response was that the man was his pastor and not his political advisor. This means one of two things about Obama has to be true. 1. That he himself is a reverse-racist or 2. His religious affiliation is facetious and not really that important to him. The thing is when you attend a church for any period of time, you are endorsing the man who leads them, at least in the world I live in. He did not condemn the speeches at the time they were given.
So what you have here in this progressive and socially conscious party is what is so degenerate and blatantly backward is the white candidate taking advantage of the issue of race in order to win a campaign and a black candidate who is associated with a reverse-racist pastor but denies any influence that his pastor may have on him, indicating that his Christian faith really has no influence on him either.
So which deceit is worse? The white person's false piety in regards to racial equality speech or the black person's false religious convictions or reverse-racism?
I used to like Pizza Hut Pizza. Before I went to college, it was my favorite choice. then I worked there for two years during college. I cooked and prepared the pizzas for one year then I delivered them from my car for one year. Eventually, my car smelled like Pizza Hut Pizza. My clothes (even non-uniform ones) would smell of pizza hut. To this day it is repulsive to me. I can smell the difference between a Pizza Hut Pizza and any other and the smell turns my stomach. Since Pizza Hut, I've moved on to sales. The thing is that when you are in sales long enough, you get used to giving pitches. You are constantly presenting something that your boss wants you to say. You get to slinging so much bullshit that you can smell bullshit before most other people do. And the democratic race reeks of it.
I was just starting to think that race was a thing of the past, that the whole black-white issue was an old paradigm that most people have worked through.
But here it is, the heart of this campaign. Coming from the wrong side of the fence that separates Democrats from Republicans. And that just stinks.
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I was actually impressed that Obama didn't throw his pastor under the bus when all of the videos started coming out.
Does it have to mean that his religion means nothing to him? Didn't we love and appreciate our ministers in our home churches, but occasionally heard things from the pulpit that we just didn't agree with? It's not like the Bible... you don't have to take all of the preaching together, all or nothing.
ummm, dude. If Mike Washburn ever blamed 911 on white people i would have walked out. Whenever my minister said something I didn't agree with, I let him know about it. And I would never EVER attend a church where the minister spewed such nonsense. EVER. Its one thing to disagree with someone (like hmm, maybe your hardline stance on immersionism came on a little strong and I don't think the Bible supports your strong claims) but its another thing to attend at a place where your minister says CRAZY things on a regular basis. CRAZY!!!
Yes it does mean that and here is why.
1. The United Church of Christ is the most insanely liberal church on the planet to begin with. No hyperbole at all, they are the enemy that Mr. Fisher tried to warn everyone about. A small, dying, insignificant denomination but a real one. I am sure there are a lot of well-meaning people who attend that denomination, but they have really missed the mark on their theology.
2. The minister of the church that he attends is nowhere even close to what his denomination teaches. I'm surprised he still has a job, but then again, if his denomination gave a rip (they don't because they are pure liberals) they would have fired him.
3. If Obama was at all devout he would have noticed that a) his minister is crazy b) his minister not only does not teach scripture but also does not follow denominational guidelines and c) the church he goes to is more interested in implementing liberal agendas (gay marriage and rights, pro-choice, etc) than spreading the Good News.
Which brings me to my next conclusion.
Obama is either crazy (in which he ascribes to the teachings of his pastor), apathetic (in which he tolerates the craziness of his pastor without correcting him), or retarded (and can't see where his pastor is wrong).
In all of this he is an incredibly more likable liar than Hillary, but both are still leftist socialists with no hope of reaching across the aisle and uniting people.
I think the thing that people fail to see is that what EVERYONE in the election means by UNITING is not UNITING but cramming their IDEOLOGY down everyone else's throats. I'm sick of people not actually listening to what he is saying. The unfortunate thing is that he is the only one with an appealing message. We all want change and unity. That is not a reality though. We need leadership, strong leadership, not warm fuzzies.
There may be many reasons to not vote for Obama (lack of content and experience, to name two) but this is hardly one fo them.
1. Wright is not still employed. There is a reason they keep calling him Obama's ex-pastor. He is retired.
2. These are probably the worst two or three things that he ever said. You have to recognize the politically motivated people poured over tapes of Wright's messages to find something.
3. It seems much more crazy to us than it would to Obama, because in our culture we have not heard those same theories spouted a million times by hundrds of people. In that culture, Wright is not so far out there. Many believe that stuff.
(BTW, I was somewhat surprised to hear you say that you thought that we may have cured the racism thing. I read recently that 66% of whites believe that blacks have achieved racial equality or will very soon. Whereas 80% of blacks think they are a long way off or may never reach it. As you know, the black culture has a much different take on this race thing than our white culture does).
4. There are many devout liberal Christians.
5. And I don't know that Wright didn't teach Scripture. I only heard about three minutes of his years of teaching. You can read a pretty good sermon of his here: http://www.preachingtoday.com/sermons/sermons/audacityofhope.html
You may continue your ranting now.
acityofhope.html
the rest of that link, sorry.
And I don't think he was blaming white people for 9/11 as much as he was blaming the U.S. government's foreign policy. Which is not all that crazy. Misguided, insensitive, but not CRAZY, as you say.
On the Sunday after 9/11 when Wright made those comments, I'd be willing to bet there were much crazier things preached all across America. It was a weird time
Post a Comment